Search results

[…] Both New York and California have passed laws prohibiting online services from providing algorithmically curated feeds to minors without parental consent; South Carolina and Nebraska’s age-appropriate design code laws require services to offer an opt-out of personalized recommender systems. The full report, including an appendix tracking a sample of enacted and proposed youth online […]

Personalization—the use of personal data to tailor content and services to individual users—sits at the center of today’s most contested debates about youth and digital technology. This report provides a comprehensive framework for understanding personalization in youth online experiences, examining its mechanisms, benefits, risks, mitigations, and the emerging legislative and regulatory landscape.

[…] Camille Herring, Bailey Sanchez, Jim Siegl, Kelly Brandmeyer, and all other reviewers for their support on this report. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All FPF materials that are released publicly are free to share and adapt with appropriate attribution. Learn more at creativecommons.org . 3 Personalization and Youth Online: Assessing Benefits, Risks, and Safeguards | June 2026 TABLE […]

[…] watching: a study on government engagement with AI platforms, new federal AI testbeds and voluntary model testing, and disclosure requirements for AI-related mass layoffs. Study on Protecting Free Speech: The draft would direct the Secretary of Commerce to study how the government encourages or pressures AI companies on content moderation, information prioritization, and output […]

[…] Rule on Bulk Sensitive Data. By bridging the gap between policy and technical, this session provides a space to trade emerging thoughts on the practicalities of meeting today’s fragmented regulatory standards. KEY DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Operationalizing Broad Definitions: How are organizations technically executing data segmentation to account for broad definitions of “consumer health data” […]

[…] federal comprehensive privacy law more likely to pass? What issues are most ripe for agreement? 2. Legislative Trends : What is going on in state privacy legislation today that’s most worrying and disruptive to your business? Data minimization? Bans on selling sensitive data? Opt-in consent requirements? Data-driven pricing restrictions? How and why? 3. Inconsistent […]

[…] Asia, and the EU creating a kaleidoscope of policy and legal measures under this broad umbrella. At the same time, China is initiating a regional system for free data flows, and the US is insistently pushing the updated Global CBPR framework while limiting some transfers of sensitive data to adversary countries for national security […]

[…] audit or assessment Employment AI gets its turn in SB 5, with new transparency requirements for automated employment-related decision technologies (AEDTs) used to shape decisions about hiring, promotion, discipline, and discharge. The section draws from broader ADMT laws, including California’s CPPA ADMT regulations, the Colorado AI Act as originally enacted in 2024, as well […]

[…] (i) publicly available information that is collated and combined to create a consumer profile made available to a user of a publicly accessible website for compensation or free of charge, (ii) publicly available information made available for sale, or (iii) any inference generated from information described in (i) or (ii).  Precise Geolocation Data: This […]

[…] Justine Gluck, Jared Bomberg, Soo Kang, Sean Perryman, and all other reviewers for their support on this report. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All FPF materials that are released publicly are free to share and adapt with appropriate attribution. Learn more . 1 Future of Privacy Forum | The Price is Right: Responsible Uses of Personal Data in […]