Search results

[…] just the consent context, recently lawmakers have crafted manipulative design provisions that apply to other types of interfaces and conduct. For example, the California Age Appropriate Design Code (CA AADC) prohibits services targeted at young people from using “dark patterns” to steer youth into sharing personal data or to act in a way that […]

[…] turned to the protection of children online this year with President Biden notably mentioning it during his State of the Union address. In California, the Age-Appropriate Design Code Act was signed into law. Our Youth & Education experts provided analysis by launching two policy briefs; one of which provides a comprehensive analysis of the […]

[…] He explained that despite the existence of accountability-focused alternatives to consent like legitimate interests and business improvement exception in Singapore’s PDPA and other similar laws, many lawyers today would still advise their clients to rely on consent as practitioners may believe that it is easier to demonstrate and operationalize compliance with consent requirements (e.g., […]

Today, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) published “The Playbook: Data Sharing for Research,” a report on best practices for instituting research data-sharing programs between corporations and research institutions. FPF also developed a summary of recommendations from the full report. Download the Playbook Read the Summary Facilitating data sharing for research purposes between corporate […]

[…] be required for all new vehicles beginning November 2026, although they could be rolled out sooner. DOT’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) will lead the rulemaking.  Today, many car makers offer different types of driver assistance technologies that can reduce crashes and improve safety for drivers, passengers, pedestrians, cyclists, and other road users. […]

[…] in the Biden administration’s Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights (Upturn, Lawyers’ Committee). Google emphasized that any rulemaking on AI should be risk-based and process-based and promote transparency, adding that “a process-based approach with possible safe harbor provisions could encourage companies to continually audit their systems for fairness without fear that looking too […]

[…] in its revised law. Then Lee stated that when it comes to implementation and interpretation, data protection regimes in the region differ significantly, and countries try to promote harmonization by mutual recognition. With regards to enforcement, she stressed that it is common to see occasional audits and that in certain countries, such as Japan, […]

[…] action. What, if any, additional language or concepts from ADPPA will gain traction at the state level? 3. Have we entered the Age of the Age-Appropriate Design Code? While ‘comprehensive’ privacy laws and proposals continue to capture the bulk of the privacy commentariat’s attention, it is likely that the most significant U.S. consumer privacy […]

The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) today released a new policy brief comparing the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (AADC), a first-of-its-kind privacy-by-design law in the United States, and the United Kingdom’s Age-Appropriate Design Code. While there are distinctions between the two codes, the California AADC, which is set to become enforceable on July […]

[…] community of data protection regulators. As a result of the difficulties, these stakeholders acknowledge that there is a need for greater consistency in regional data protection frameworks. Today, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) — a global non-profit focused on privacy and data protection — and experts from the Asian Business Law Institute (ABLI) […]