Search results

[…] Amendment, laws prohibiting the creation of deepfakes in certain circumstances—such as in the case of election-related content and digital replicas of deceased people—are a violation of constitutionally-protected free expression. For example, in early October a federal judge enjoined a recently-enacted California law that would prohibit knowingly and maliciously distributing communications with “materially deceptive” content […]

[…] Brazil ANPD’s decisions contain insights into the assessment criteria that DPAs are starting to deploy when looking at the impact generative AI has on the rights and freedoms of individuals1 in the context of the compatibility of this new technology with data protection law. In particular, the salient issues that surface are related to:  […]

[…] actions. Greater collaboration between regulators and technical experts may also help build a shared understanding of personal information in LLMs, non-LLM AI models, and AI systems and promote consistency in data protection regulation.  Even if California’s policy and legal conclusions ultimately differ from conclusions in other jurisdictions, building a shared (technical) understanding will help […]

[…] Maryland Senator Katie Fry Hester (D) Minnesota Representative Steve Elkins (D) Minnesota Representative Kristin Bahner (D) New York Senator Kristen Gonzalez (D) Texas Representative Giovanni Capriglione (R) Virginia Delegate Michelle Maldonado (D)  Learn more about the work of the Multistate AI Policymaker Working Group here. FPF Clarifies Non-Partisan State Work February 25, 2025 By: […]

[…] loss of housing opportunities, or jeopardization of personal relationships.  These risks have increased as certain U.S. states have pursued and enacted laws to undermine the rights and freedoms of LGBTQ+ people and communities. Efforts to restrict gender-affirming care have gained traction in several states, and lawmakers in Oklahoma, Texas, and South Carolina have proposed […]

[…] Communications Intern On September 28, Governor Gavin Newsom signed California AB 3030, among a host of AI bills. CA AB 3030 amended the California Health & Safety Code and requires specified healthcare entities to disclose the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in provider-patient communications through visual or verbal disclaimers presented before, during, and/or […]

At the end of the 2024 legislative session, New York State passed a pair of bills aimed at creating heightened protections for children and teens online. One, the New York Child Data Protection Act (NYCDPA), applies to a broad range of online services that are “primarily directed to children.” The NYCDPA creates novel substantive […]

[…] regarding privacy. This Report provides a comprehensive analysis of strategy documents and key regulatory actions of the DPAs in 10 jurisdictions, published or developed in 2023 and 2024, setting out regulatory priorities for the following years: 1. Australia  2. China 3. Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China (SAR)  4. Japan 5. Malaysia 6. […]

[…] on connected vehicles has built upon this initial product, providing additional resources, up to and including the Vehicle Safety Systems Privacy Risks and Recommendations report from March 2024. The report specifically highlights the potential for privacy risks to exist when new technology is incorporated, through requirement or choice, In addition to comments to the […]

FPF’s “Data and the Connected Vehicle” Demystifies Connected Car Ecosystem as Policymakers Look to Regulate SEPT. 16, 2024 — Vehicle technologies are evolving rapidly, in every facet of the system, from safety features to entertainment, and occupant convenience. Many of these new features are enabled by the collection of driver and occupant data – […]