Search results

[…] (Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-2,153), New Hampshire (NH. St. § 189:68-a), New Jersey (Assembly Bill 4978, signed into law Jan. 2020), North Carolina (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-401.2), Oregon (Or. Rev. Stat. Ann § 336.184-187),  Texas (Tex. Educ. Code § 32.151), Virginia (Va. Code Ann. § 22.1-289.01), and Washington State (Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.604).

[…] emergency, over the past few months state legislatures in the United States have diverted their resources towards establishing state and local reopening plans, allocating federal aid, and promoting public trust and public participation by addressing concerns over privacy and civil liberties.  Many states have introduced bills which would govern collection, use, and sharing of […]

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

[…] the data they collect, and ensure that any secondary or downstream uses of data are not unexpected or discriminatory (even if such uses ensure an app is free to use).  What do you see happening over the next few years in ad-tech? Over the past few years, we’ve seen the GDPR have a very […]

[…] ages of digital consent, there are also differing interpretations of the obligations on information society services regarding children. For example, the United Kingdom’s proposed Age Appropriate Design Code defines a child as a person under the age of 18 and lays out additional requirements for information society services to build in privacy by design […]

[…] the data is linked to a particular user or device, and if the data will be used to track users. Because SDK’s run in-process with other app code, and share the app’s access permissions, developer responses are required to reflect both the practices of the app as well as any 3rd party code within […]

[…] could be compromised by internal or external attacks.  This paper proposes a model that builds on Software Guard Extensions (SGX) enclaves, which limit untrusted platform’s access to code or data, and Ryoan (distributed sandboxes that separate programs from one another to prevent unintentional transfer or contamination).  Ryoan sandboxes confine code, allows it to define […]

[…] consumers are not the product, but rather “Angel Au-Yeung, “California Wants to Copy Alaska and Pay People a ‘Data Dividend.’ Is It Realistic?” Forbes(Feb. 14, 2019), https://www.forbes.com/sites/angelauyeung/2019/02/14/california-wants-to-copy-alaska-and-pay-people-a-data-dividend–is-it-realistic/#30486ee6222c. Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.125(b)(1) (“A business may offer financial incentives, including payments to consumers as compensation for the collection of personal information, the sale of personal information, or […]

[…] mere existence was unlawful in some quarters due to anti-miscegenation laws…and you may be surprised to know this repugnant language remained in state constitutions after Loving v Virginia — till 1987 in Mississippi; 1998 in South Carolina and 2000 in Alabama. Being both black and white I KNOW how hard this topic is. For […]

[…] In that spirit, we would like to call attention to the work of Professor Ruha Benjamin and her book Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. The FPF Privacy Book Club was honored to learn from Professor Benjamin this week and we invite you to watch the video and order her book. We found it to be a thought-provoking […]