Search results

[…]   A.  Self Verification  a.  The site asks the user in a neutral way what his  or her birth date is, and if the user is  underage, a session cookie is placed in their brows er preventing access for the duration  of their web browsing session.  i.  Self-verification of this sort is the standard i n the USA, where the Children’s  Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) requires all  web sites which collect   personally identifiable information (PII) of childr en to obtain verifiable parental  consent. Sites that are not aimed at children that  collect personal information  may rely on the neutral age screen to ensure that u sers are adults. And, as noted  in the DG Infosoc report 1, self-verification is the technique favored by man y adult  web sites and social networking sites in Europe.  ii.  Advantages :  Cheap and easy to implement.   iii.  Concerns : Easy for people to lie.   1 See Information Society & Media Directorate-General (DG Infosoc): Background Report on Cross Media Rat ing and Classification, and Age Verification Solutions, p.18 […]

[…] online. The understanding will breed trust, and the trust will breed a more viable advertising solution. We agree with Jeff Hirsch, CEO of AudienceScience. But talk is cheap. Will industry really seek to deliver on user trust? We hope so but we also think that many aren’t yet engaged in the hard work needed […]

[…] Report. DC – 034863/000001 – 2911342 v3 19 advertisements based on location information derived directly from the consumers’ mobile device can be delivered to the consumers’ mobile phones. 54 The Report noted that industry members widely agree that privacy practices in the mobile marketplace should incorporate two key tenets of consumer privacy—notice and consent. […]

[…] by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner and co-sponsored by 15 other GPA member authorities. The GPA resolved to four specific steps after articulating a greater number of underlying concerns – specifically, that: The collection, use and disclosure of personal data for the pre-training, training, and fine tuning of AI models is within […]

[…] elements for an entity to qualify as a representative. FPF again believes that the final rule addresse s the question properly. First, t he rule includes a number of required steps and interactions that must be taken between the data provider, consumer, and third party that cover authentication, authorization, and operations . These activities […]

[…] to crisis helplines. These protocols must be publicly available on the operator’s website and annually reported to the California Office of Suicide Prevention, including data on the number crisis referrals but no personal user information. Safeguards for Minors: When an operator knows a user is a minor, the law also requires operators to disclose […]

[…] work better for individuals, which Draghi does not mention at all. The EU institutions, with input from the European Data Protection Board, should agree on a limited number of clearly-defined priorities to be dealt with in any reform. Any changes that affect the fundamental principles of the GDPR or reduce the level of protection […]

[…] • Where PD of vulnerable natural persons, in particular of children, are processed; or • Where processing involves a large amount of PD and affects a large number of data subjects. Recital 75. California and Colorado have a slight difference in approach tied to the triggers for an assessment (see above). For example, Colorado […]

[…] MD MA MI MN MS MO MTNV Nb NM NY NC OH OK OR PA RI SC TX UT VT VA WA WV WY Overview of the number of industry-focused AI bills introduced per state in 2025, distinguishing how many bills were enrolled or enacted per state. Introduced AI Billls, Enrolled or Enacted by […]