Search results

[…] ory information ” means information about a student that would not generally be considered harmful or an invasion of privacy if disclosed, such as name, address, and telephone number ; many schools adopt directory information policies in order to include this information in yearbooks, concert programs, student/parent directories, etc. (See 34 CFR § 99.3 […]

[…] notice from a parent, an educational agency or institution may release directory information without consent. FERPA defines directory information to include the following: “the student’s name, address, telephone listing, da te and place of birth, major field of study, participation in officially recognized activities and sports, weight and height of members of athletic teams, […]

[…] for wiretaps.12 Initially, a closely divided Supreme Court in 1928 held that the Fourth Amendment did not apply, because the wiretap was done “in public” at the telephone poll.13 Soon after, the Congress passed a law regulating wiretaps.14 In the 1960’s, the Supreme Court reversed that decision in the famous Katz and Berger cases, […]

[…] speech he 45 Article L. 871 -1 of the French Internal Security Code 46 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/12/opinion/apple -googl e-when -phone -encryption -blocks -justice.html?_r=1 47 http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/societe/francois -molins -les -nouveaux – telephones -rendent -la-justice – aveugle_1711458.html 48 Opinion n o2015 -078 of 5 March 2015 on intelligence bill ( Délibération n o2015 -078 du 5 mars 2015 portant […]

[…] the’ Fourth’ Amendment’ for’ wiretaps.12”Initially,’ a’ closely’ divided’ Supreme’Court’ in’ 1928′ held’ that’ the’ Fourth’ Amendment’ did’ not’ apply,’ because’ the’ wiretap’was’ done’ “in’ public”‘ at’ the’ telephone‘ poll.13”Soon’ after,’ the’ Congress’ passed’ a’ law’regulating’wiretaps.14’In’the’1960’s,’the’Supreme’Court’reversed’that’decision’in’the’famous’Katz’and’Berger’cases,’ and’ set’ forth’ detailed’ requirements’ for’ law’enforcement’ wiretaps.15”Congress’ enacted’those’ protections’ in’ 1968′ in’ Title’ III’ of’that’ year’s’ crime’ bill,’ […]

[…] FPF Senior Fellow explains how the past week has seen two significant events concerning Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act. First, on May 7, the Second Circuit ruled that “the telephone metadata program exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized and therefore violates” Section 215. And yesterday, the House of Representatives approved the USA FREEDOM Act by […]

[…] should be taken into careful consideration in whatever approach the Commission pursues. He concludes that translating Section 222 privacy protections to the broadband sector is far from a simple task, noting the “considerable technical and market differences from the telephone market governed by the 1996 CPNI rules.” Professor Swire’s full written comments are available here.

[…] Ka nstoroom & Eric Osberg, eds., 2008). 8 See 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(a)(4)(B); 34 C.F.R. §§ 99.10 – 99.20. 9 Directory information includes “the student’s name, address, telephone listing, date and place of birth, major field of study, participation in officially recognized activities and sports, weight and height of members of athletic teams, dates […]

[…] GSM, CDMA, and LTE are wireless technology standar ds that, inter alia , facilitate high-speed mobile data transmissions to and from multiple terrestrial network terminals, such as telephone handsets, tab lets, vehicles, and other devices. 7 A hexadecimal number is expressed in base 16 with the numerals 0-9 representing the numbers 0-9 and the […]

[…] 15 Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. __ (2013). 16 Katz, 389 U.S. at 351. 17 17 U.S.C. §102(b). 18 17 U.S.C. §103(b); Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). 19 For an early suggestion, in a Large Data context, see Pamela Samuelson, Privacy as Intellectual Property? , 52 […]