Search results

[…] in “widely distributed media.” “Direct identifier” is defined as “information that is commonly used to identify a data subject, including name, physical address, email address, recognizable photograph, telephone number, and Social Security number.” “Deidentified data” is defined as “personal data that is modified to remove all direct identifiers and to reasonably ensure that the […]

[…] to future harm. 4. What else? The TransUnion opinion might impact class certification analysis, could influence judicial interpretation of other longstanding federal privacy laws, such as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), and could mean that certain plaintiffs begin to favor state court forums that do not require plaintiffs to show that they have […]

[…] always, related to identifiability of data). For example, a key difference between the federal commercial emailing law, CAN-SPAM (very preemptive), and the federal commercial telemarketing law, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (not preemptive except with respect to certain inter-state standards) is the relative ease with which the personal data being regulated can be localized, […]

[…] constitutional rights to free speech and expression which also protect ‘the rights of individuals to listen, read and receive the said speech‘ (Tata Press Ltd v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd, (1995) 5 SCC 139).  Tighter timelines for grievance redress, content take down and information sharing with law enforcement: Rule 3 includes enhanced requirements to […]

[…] text accompanying notes 53-64 (detailing description and further resources onthe e-threat of pretexting).online transactions. Additionally, however, many companies desire other 14forms of PII—such as home and employment telephone numbers, socialsecurity numbers, mother’s maiden name, personal income, or jobfield/description—merely to supplement a purchaser’s database profile.15As mentioned previously, companies desire this information becausedetailed individual profiles are […]

Privacy Papers for Policy Makers 2009-2010 Cover The publication of “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers” was supported by AT&T, LexisNexis, Microsoft and Procter & Gamble Inside front cover September 15, 2010 We are delighted to provide you with this Journal featuring works selected by the Future of Privacy Forum Advisory Board as the best “Privacy […]

[…] Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, June 2009, Stuttgart, Germany , http://www -nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/esv/esv21/09 – 0351.pdf . 166 Article 13 of the e -Privacy Directive. 167 The Telephone Consumer Protection Act , 47 U.S.C. § 227 ; The CAN -SPAM Act, 15 U.S.C. 770 1, et seq., Pub . L. No. 108 -187 ; […]

[…] Reasonable Policies , 213 FEB . N.J. LAW . 41, 43 (2002); Connie Barba, “That‟s No „Beep‟, That‟s My Boss”: Congress Seeks to Disconnect the Secrecy of Telephone Monitoring in th e Workplace , 21 JOHN MARSHALL L. REV . 881, 883 n.17 (1988); Meir S. Hornung, Note, Think Before You Type: A Look […]

[…] See infra notes 221 –222 and accompanying text (contrasting provider exceptions). 23 See infra note 226 and accompanying text (provider exception); note 245 and accompanying text (term telephone modifies term equipment); note 295 (interstate commerce requirement). 24 Use of thi s phrase has been attributed to Kathy Stone. Michael Selmi, Privacy for the Working […]

[…] a ect you using information about you, for example to recommend products or services based on your previous purchases CON[attr] To contact you through means other than telephone (for exam- ple, email or postal mail) to market services or products HIS[attr] To aid in historical preservation as governed by a law or policy described […]