Search results

[…] 1. Social media accounts linked to user account 2. Profile photograph 3. Opt-ins/opt-outs for marketing & working group selections 4. W orking group membership selections 5. A free-text user account bio 6. User-user interactions — posts visible to the community , private “direct messages”, “connection/friends” selections 7. T echnical information (browser , IP address, […]

[…] 1. Social media accounts linked to user account 2. Profile photograph 3. Opt-ins/opt-outs for marketing & working group selections 4. W orking group membership selections 5. A free-text user account bio 6. User-user interactions — posts visible to the community , private “direct messages”, “connection/friends” selections 7. T echnical information (browser , IP address, […]

[…] 1. Social media accounts linked to user account 2. Profile photograph 3. Opt-ins/opt-outs for marketing & working group selections 4. W orking group membership selections 5. A free-text user account bio 6. User-user interactions — posts visible to the community , private “direct messages”, “connection/friends” selections 7. T echnical information (browser , IP address, […]

[…] 1. Social media accounts linked to user account 2. Profile photograph 3. Opt-ins/opt-outs for marketing & working group selections 4. W orking group membership selections 5. A free-text user account bio 6. User-user interactions — posts visible to the community , private “direct messages”, “connection/friends” selections 7. T echnical information (browser , IP address, […]

[…] Amendment, laws prohibiting the creation of deepfakes in certain circumstances—such as in the case of election-related content and digital replicas of deceased people—are a violation of constitutionally-protected free expression. For example, in early October a federal judge enjoined a recently-enacted California law that would prohibit knowingly and maliciously distributing communications with “materially deceptive” content […]

[…] law that created safeguards for information maintained about you in federal “systems of records,” how and why it was passed, the extent to which it remains effective today, and the lessons it may hold for our modern debates in the United States about both commercial and government uses of AI. We will be joined […]

[…] based on real-time phone call content analysis and the privacy implications of these technologies. AI detection technologies raise potential privacy risks. Additionally , as they are used today , these technologies have functional limitations. As such, we recommend that the Commission continue to evaluate their capabilities, potentials, and impacts, and consider what role privacy-enhancing […]

Today, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) released a new report, Synthetic Content: Exploring the Risks, Technical Approaches, and Regulatory Responses, which analyzes the various approaches being pursued to address the risks associated with “synthetic” content – material produced by generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools. As more people use generative AI to create […]

[…] ould m eetthe reasonable person standard than a creativity toolw here the studentcan request thatspecific im ages be generated orthe use case ofhaving the studentgenerate com puter code.In the case ofthe form er,the review erw ould be rightto say thata reasonable m em berof the schoolcom m unity could identify the student,and thatthe data […]