Search results

[…] establishing their own means for individuals to exercise their rights (e.g., Delaware). California was slightly more prescriptive in its requirements (e.g., requiring that businesses offer a toll- free telephone number to exercise rights) but ultimately leaves much to the discretion of businesses. New Hampshire’s requirement that the secretary of state establish a uniform means […]

[…] noted that this was an evolving trend and suggested that it would likely extend to India as well.  Panelists noted that some data protection authorities were proactively promoting alternative legal bases to consent. This need arose because organizations in their jurisdictions were over-relying on consent as the de facto default legal basis for processing […]

[…] Zurich, under the advisorship of Prof. Dr. Martin Vechev. His research focuses on the security and privacy of modern machine learning systems, investigating federated learning, synthetic data, code generation, and large language models. He was part of the SRI team, winning the 2023 U.S. PETs Prize Federated Learning Red Teaming Challenge organized by NIST. […]

[…] their hiring a nd employment decisions (“AI tools”). These tools can help match candidates with relevant opportunities and inform organizations’ decisions about who to recruit, hire, and promote. More broadly, they can also help candidates discover and describe their skills, fi nd new opportunities that match their experience, and suggest steps to position them […]

[…] indicated that this did “not exclude additional UOOMs from meeting the requirements” in the future. This could mean the other shortlisted opt out mechanisms (i.e., the OptOut Code or the Opt-Out Machine) or some tool that has not yet been developed may be able to be approved in the future. However, the process for […]

[…] Jersey, only the Colorado Privacy Act’s implementing regulations required that DPAs occur prior to initiating processing. Following the NetChoice v. Bonta litigation, which saw California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act preliminarily enjoined, this requirement could raise First Amendment concerns if it is interpreted as a prior restraint on speech. 3. Thresholds for Applicability S332 is […]

[…] one company and then shared or sold to another. While data collection can benefit both you and businesses – like connecting with friends, getting directions, or sales promotions – it can also be used in invasive ways unless you take control. You can protect your personal data and information in many ways and control […]

[…] regularly and discuss industry specific issues and top of mind concerns. These industries include: ● Auto Privacy Executives ● AI Regulation for Privacy Executives ● Bank Privacy Executives ● Clinics, Telehealth, & Pharmacies Privacy Executives ● Pharmaceutical Privacy Executives ● Retail Privacy Executives ● Travel Privacy Executives Please feel free to email [email protected] with questions.

[…] these winning papers were awarded based on the strength of their research and proposed policy solutions for policymakers and regulators in the U.S. and abroad. The Privacy Papers for Policymakers event will be held on February 27, 2024, in Washington, D.C., exact location to be announced. The event is free and open to the public.

[…] AI Verify, the IMDA and the PDPC hope that the global AI testing community can gravitate towards workable standards in various industries and use cases.  Third, to promote user trust, AI Verify permits organizations to conduct self-testing on premises, and also allows for third-party testing. The AI Verify Foundation, which oversees the development and […]