Search results

[…] Amendment, laws prohibiting the creation of deepfakes in certain circumstances—such as in the case of election-related content and digital replicas of deceased people—are a violation of constitutionally-protected free expression. For example, in early October a federal judge enjoined a recently-enacted California law that would prohibit knowingly and maliciously distributing communications with “materially deceptive” content […]

[…] Communications Intern On September 28, Governor Gavin Newsom signed California AB 3030, among a host of AI bills. CA AB 3030 amended the California Health & Safety Code and requires specified healthcare entities to disclose the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in provider-patient communications through visual or verbal disclaimers presented before, during, and/or […]

[…] and extraction of certain information from webpages might contain personal data, including sensitive categories of personal data, which could “carry peculiar risks for the fundamental rights and freedoms” of individuals.   Processing of publicly available personal data would not be subject to obligations under the DPDPA to the extent that any personal data contained in […]

[…] interpretation of the GDPR by national DPAs remains fragmented as DPAs continue to adopt diverging interpretations of key data protection concepts, creating legal uncertainty and disrupting the free movement of personal data. Some of the specific issues raised by stakeholders include different views on the appropriate legal basis for processing personal data, diverging opinions […]

[…] yet significant milestones lie ahead. Anticipated developments include forthcoming updates to the Privacy Act, new industry guidelines from eSafety, and the introduction of a Children’s Online Privacy Code by the Australian Government. These initiatives are instrumental in crafting a secure and empowering digital environment for the youth, balancing the imperatives of privacy, safety, and […]

[…] divergent definitions. To ensure focus and regulatory efforts are targeted toward technologies that play an impactful role in individuals’ rights, FPF recommended alignment with definitions from Government Code § 11546.45.51, the CPPA Draft Regulations, and Assembly Bill 2930 that require the ADS role be “substantial” to the decision-making process. Law / Proposal Definition Civil […]

[…] Josh Lee, Sakshi Shivhare, Brendan Tan. (L-R) Second row:  Lee Matheson and Dominic Paulger. 2. At the IAPP Asia Privacy Forum, FPF organized a panel to examine India’s landmark data protection legislation, and also participated in a panel on data sovereignty. 2.1. On July 18, FPF organized a panel titled “Demystifying India’s Digital Personal […]

[…] journey. On a separate note, panelists also discussed data governance as an essential component of digital public infrastructures (DPIs)1. For instance, they noted DPIs became relevant after India included them as a priority during its G20 presidency. Although digital public infrastructure is still an evolving concept, it can be explored as an alternative to […]