Search results

[…] on our Board of Directors – namely, Anita Allen, Debra Berlin, Danielle Citron, Mary Culnan, David Hoffman, Agnes Bundy Scanlan, and Dale Skivington. “It’s been a pleasure getting to work with Chris Wolf and seeing the vision we had for FPF as a hub for privacy education and research develop over the years and […]

[…] neurodata should be private, and should not be stored or sold without consent. Personal Identity: Neurotechnology should not alter “mental integrity,” or an individual’s sense of self.  Free Will: Individuals should retain decision-making control, without unknown manipulation via neurotechnology. Fair Access to Mental Augmentation: Cognitive enhancement neurotechnology should be accessible to everyone. Protection from […]

[…] as a victim of crime, included in Oregon, or financial information, included in California and New Jersey). The definition of biometric data is broader than that in Virginia (covering data generated from a photograph or an audio or video recording if generated to identify a specific individual), but narrower than that in New Jersey […]

[…] consent under the DPDPA. During the discussion, panelists emphasized the importance of clear, understandable written notices and discussed other design choices to ensure that consent is “ free, specific, informed, unconditional, and unambiguous”. To this end, Swati Sinha highlighted consent notices for different categories of cookies under the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), […]

[…] PETs, provide useful information to policymakers, and contribute to the development of systems and products to support AI. For more information about the RCN and how to get involved, please contact [email protected]. To keep updated on similar issues and emerging topics, apply to join the Ethics and Data in Research Working Group. The Research […]

[…] and Choice under Rule 5.03 and Default Settings under Rule 5.04. The notice and choice requirements ask UOOM vendors to ensure that the signal represents an “affirmative, freely given, and unambiguous choice to opt out” of targeted advertising and data sales. The requirements for default settings seek to ensure the choice remains a genuine […]

[…] Jersey, only the Colorado Privacy Act’s implementing regulations required that DPAs occur prior to initiating processing. Following the NetChoice v. Bonta litigation, which saw California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act preliminarily enjoined, this requirement could raise First Amendment concerns if it is interpreted as a prior restraint on speech. 3. Thresholds for Applicability S332 is […]

[…] collected about you by one company and then shared or sold to another. While data collection can benefit both you and businesses – like connecting with friends, getting directions, or sales promotions – it can also be used in invasive ways unless you take control. You can protect your personal data and information in […]

[…] FPF’s 2023 Privacy Papers for Policymakers Award winners are: Towards a Latin American Model of Adequacy for the International Transfer of Personal Data by Luca Belli, Fundação Getulio Vargas Law School; Ana Brian Nougrères, Naciones Unidas en el Derecho a la Privacidad; Jonathan Mendoza Iserte, INAI, Mexico; Pablo Palazzi, Centro de tecnología y Sociedad […]

[…] sometimes longer. According to the discussion paper, the FDA strives to “facilitate innovation while safeguarding public health” and plans to develop a “flexible risk-based regulatory framework that promotes innovation and protects patient safety.” Lesson 2: Different uses of data may implicate different regulatory structures While there can be uncertainty regarding whether particular data, such […]