Search results

[…] E ne rg ie s ( M arc h 2 0 20 ), h ttp s:/ /d oi.o rg /1 0 .3 39 0 /e n13 0 614 73 ; O lg a A kse lr o d , H ow A rtifi cia l I n te llig ence C an D eep […]

[…] The panel seemed skeptical of the State’s argument that the California AADC does not regulate content, particularly through the DPIA provisions concerning whether the design of a service could expose children to “harmful, or potentially harmful content” or lead to children “experiencing or being targeted by harmful, or potentially harmful, contacts.” While NetChoice conceded […]

[…] data localization. Ultimately, the usefulness, scale of impact, and regulatory compliance benefits of confidential computing depend on the specific configuration and management of the TEE and attestation service.  Download the paper here for a more detailed discussion of confidential computing and how it differs from other PETs, as well as an in-depth analysis of […]

[…] workloads or the underlying system and platform.” Intel “Confidential Computing offers a hardware-based security solution des igned to help protect data in use via unique application-isolation technology called a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE).” Confidential Computing Consortium “Confidential Computing is the protection of data in use by performing computation in a hardware-based, attested Trusted Execution […]

[…] the measures pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. (Art. 3(26)) National Competent Authority : A notifying authority or a market surveillance authority; as regards AI systems put into service or used by Union institutions, agencies, offices and bodies, references to national competent authorities or market surveillance authorities in this Regulation shall be construed as references […]

[…] E ne rg ie s ( M arc h 2 0 20 ), h ttp s:/ /d oi.o rg /1 0 .3 39 0 /e n13 0 614 73 ; O lg a A kse lr o d , H ow A rtifi cia l I n te llig ence C an D eep […]

[…] Practices” Obligation for a Narrow Set of Businesses The RIDTPPA includes a unique, prescriptive privacy notice obligation, which has two subcomponents. First, any “commercial website” or internet service provider (ISP) who (1) conducts business in Rhode Island, (2) has customers in Rhode Island, or (3) is otherwise subject to Rhode Island jurisdiction must “designate […]

[…] as Congress continues to consider amending COPPA to establish federal privacy protections for teens.  Cothron v. White Castle: Multiple Actionable Harms from Single Privacy Violations Spur Legislative Change: In Cothron v. White Castle, the Illinois Supreme Court addressed the critical question of when privacy claims accrue under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, prompting […]