![post image](https://fpf.org/wp-content/themes/fpf/img/post.png)
Subscribe to FPF Statements and Media Releases
Do you want to be the first to get the FPF perspective on major developments in privacy and receive announcements about FPF programs? Subscribe to our media list. Subscribe * indicates required Email Address * First Name* Last Name* Outlet Phone Number Address Address Line 2 City* State/Province/Region Postal / Zip Code Country* USAAaland IslandsAfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican […]
![Washington 509737 1920](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/washington-509737_1920.jpg)
Privacy Papers 2019
The winners of the 2019 Privacy Papers for Policymakers (PPPM) Award are: Antidiscriminatory Privacy by Ignacio N. Cofone, McGill University Faculty of Law Abstract Law often regulates the flow of information to prevent discrimination. It does so, for example, in Law often blocks sensitive personal information to prevent discrimination. It does so, however, without a […]
![Hart Senate Office Building Hearing Room](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Hart_Senate_Office_Building_Hearing_Room.jpg)
Closer than Apart: Comparing Senate Commerce Committee Bills
Together with Senator Cantwell (D-WA)’s bill, the Consumer Online Privacy Rights Act, Senator Wicker’s Discussion Draft represents a significant movement toward bipartisan negotiations in the Senate. But how do the two bills, one from leading Democrats, and one from the Republican Chairman, compare to each other? We find them to be closer together on most issues than they are apart: a promising sign for bipartisan negotiation.
![Us Capitol Building 2225764 1920](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/us-capitol-building-2225764_1920.jpg)
Starting Point for Negotiation: An Analysis of Senate Democratic Leadership’s Landmark Comprehensive Privacy Bill
Today, Senate Commerce Committee Ranking Member Maria Cantwell (D-WA), joined by top Democrats on the Senate Commerce Committee – Senators Markey, Schatz and Klobuchar – introduced a new comprehensive federal privacy bill, the Consumer Online Privacy Rights Act (COPRA). The bill is consistent with the Senate Democratic leadership positions announced last week and comes in advance of a December 4th Senate Commerce Committee hearing convened by Senator Wicker (R-Miss), Examining Legislative Proposals to Protect Consumer Data Privacy.
![post image](https://fpf.org/wp-content/themes/fpf/img/post.png)
Event Manager – FPF
General Overview: The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF), a dynamic nonprofit organization that serves as a catalyst for privacy scholarship and advancing principled data practices in support of emerging technologies, is seeking an Event Manager to serve as an in-house expert responsible for logistical management and execution of all FPF-hosted or sponsored events. The Event […]
![post image](https://fpf.org/wp-content/themes/fpf/img/post.png)
What We're Reading: Europe
June 2019 A round-up of the most important developments in the EU Data Protection world Enforcement The Italian DPA levied a 2.000.000€ (IT) fine against a telemarketing company and its call-center operations conducted by a de facto “sub-contractor” in Albania for creating contact lists, calling people and sharing their telephone numbers with a third party (their client) […]
![Untitled Design](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Untitled-design-e1562176833379.png)
California’s AB-1395 Highlights the Challenges of Regulating Voice Recognition
Under the radar of ongoing debates over the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Senate Judiciary Committee will also soon be considering, at a July 9th hearing, an unusual sectoral privacy bill regulating “smart speakers.” AB-1395 would amend California’s existing laws to add new restrictions for “smart speaker devices,” defined as standalone devices “with […]
![Nai Code Graphic Final](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/NAI-Code-Graphic_final.png)
NAI’s 2020 Code of Conduct Expands Self-Regulation for Ad Tech Providers
By Christy Harris, Stacey Gray, and Meredith Richards As debates over the shape of federal privacy legislation in the United States continue, online advertising remains a key focus of scrutiny in the US Congress, with its recent hearing on digital advertising and data privacy. Amidst these debates, the Networking Advertising Initiative (NAI), the leading self-regulatory body […]
![Technology 120548806](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Technology_120548806.jpg)
As Legislators Debate Ad Tech, Browsers and Operating Systems Announce New Technical Controls
Congress continues to hold data privacy hearings, including yesterday’s Understanding the Digital Advertising Ecosystem and the Impact of Data Privacy and Competition Policy. The continued debate over adtech practices is reaching a crescendo, making the case for quick action on a comprehensive federal privacy law that can set parameters for how personal data is collected, […]
![post image](https://fpf.org/wp-content/themes/fpf/img/post.png)
CPDP 2019 Panel: Understanding the limits and benefits of data portability
By Gabriela Zanfir-Fortuna and Sasha Hondagneu-Messner The Future of Privacy Forum organized a panel at the 2019 Computers, Privacy and Data Protection Conference in Brussels to discuss the limits and benefits of the right to data portability as introduced by the GDPR. This panel was chaired by Thomas Zerdick (EDPS), moderated by Stacey Gray (FPF), […]