Search results

[…] gov/publications/drafts/nistir-8062/nistir_8062_ draft.pdf . ›Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice, Guide to Conducting Privacy Impact Assessments: for State, Local, and Tribal Justice Entities (2012), https://it.ojp.gov/documents/d/ Guide% 20to%20Conducting%20Privacy%20 Impact%20Assessments_compliant.pdf . ›Information Commissioner’s Office (UK), Data Protection Impact Assessments (Aug. 2018), https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to- the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/ accountability-and-governance/data-protection- impact-assessments/. ›National Commission on Informatics & Liberty (Commisson nationale de I’linformatique […]

[…] tio n. Lin k: http s:/ /s ta n dard s.ie ee.o rg /d eve lo p/in dco nn/e c/e ad _m eth odo lo gie s% 20to % 20gu id e% 20 eth ic a l% 20 re se arc h .p df Eth ic s, R ese arc h & Deve lo […]

              BEYO ND E XPLA IN ABIL IT Y:         A  P ra ctic al G uid e t o  M an ag in g R is k in  M ac h in e L earn in g M odels           B y     Andre w  B urt […]

[…] and ownership of Banco Popular instruments. Those deemed eligible could then submit comments through an online form. More than 23,000 comments were received, each assigned an alphanumeric code. In June 2019, the SRB transferred 1,104 comments relevant to the valuation to Deloitte via a secure server. Deloitte never received the underlying identification data or […]

[…] Chart: Risk Assessment (DPIA) Requirements in California, Colorado, and the EU California Colorado EU FPF Analysis: CA v. CO References California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185, subd. (a)(15) Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1309 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 35 This comparison chart focuses on the […]

G en era ti ve AI fo r Org an iz a ti on al Use : I n te rn al Polic y Cons id era tio ns F u tu re of Priv a cy Fo ru m , up d ate d Ju ne 20 24 C O NSID ER ATIO NS […]

[…] Beyond disclosure and safety, some bills experimented with accountability measures tied to privacy and advertising . Utah’s SB 452 (enacted), for example, prohibits mental health chatbots from promoting products during conversations unless clearly labeled as advertising. California’s AB 1064 (enrolled) initially highlighted concerns about how personal data from chatbot interactions w ith youth may […]

[…] through user-generated input. For example, a 2015 claim against Snap, Inc. survived Section 230 dismissal following a claim that a specific “Speed Filter” Snapchat feature (since discontinued) promoted reckless driving.  In other cases, the personalization of a system through demographic-based targeting that causes harm may also implicate tort and product liability law when organizations […]

[…] personality-like features, whether it is a specific voice mode, or a consistent persona, or even a range of “AI companions.” Even if companion-like personalities are not directly promoted as features, users can build them using system prompts and customized design; an early 2023 feature of OpenAI enabled users to create custom GPTs.  Figure 3 […]

Conversational AI technologies are hyper-personalizing. Across sectors, companies are focused on offering personalized experiences that are tailored to users’ preferences, behaviors, and virtual and physical environments. These range from general purpose LLMs, to the rapidly growing market for LLM-powered AI companions, educational aides, and corporate assistants. There are clear trends among this overall focus: towards […]