Search results

[…] Data Collection Practices. …………………………7 2. The Collection of Consumer’s Personal Data Also Raises Invasion of Privacy, Identity Theft, and Discrimination Concerns. ………………………………………………………………………………………..8 IV. To Safeguard Consumers and Promote Broadband Adoption and Use, the Commission Should Ensure that its National Broadband Plan Addresses the Critical Privacy Elements of Transparency and Control ………………………………………11 A. Companies Should […]

[…] State AI Report. From a compliance perspective, disclosure standards provide tangible obligations for developers to operationalize. From a consumer protection standpoint, legislators view them as tools to promote transparency, prevent deception, and curb excessive engagement by reminding users, especially minors, that they are interacting with an AI system. B. Safety Protocols and Risk Mitigation […]

[…] and ownership of Banco Popular instruments. Those deemed eligible could then submit comments through an online form. More than 23,000 comments were received, each assigned an alphanumeric code. In June 2019, the SRB transferred 1,104 comments relevant to the valuation to Deloitte via a secure server. Deloitte never received the underlying identification data or […]

[…] diverse perspectives and informed discussion. There has been much interest in the report on European competitiveness issued in September 2024 by former Italian Prime Minister and European Central Bank President Mario Draghi at the request of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, which calls for reform of the EU General Data Protection Regulation […]

[…] Chart: Risk Assessment (DPIA) Requirements in California, Colorado, and the EU California Colorado EU FPF Analysis: CA v. CO References California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185, subd. (a)(15) Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1309 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 35 This comparison chart focuses on the […]

[…] role in shaping “well-balanced AI policies beyond our borders—especially in the absence of a comprehensive federal framework.” Supporters view the bill as a critical first step toward promoting transparency and reducing serious safety risks, while critics argue its requirements could be unduly burdensome on AI developers, potentially inhibiting innovation. These debates come as New […]

[…] Beyond disclosure and safety, some bills experimented with accountability measures tied to privacy and advertising . Utah’s SB 452 (enacted), for example, prohibits mental health chatbots from promoting products during conversations unless clearly labeled as advertising. California’s AB 1064 (enrolled) initially highlighted concerns about how personal data from chatbot interactions w ith youth may […]

[…] like suicide and self-harm, and restrictions on data use and advertising. Chatbots drew heightened legislative attention following recent court cases and high-profile incidents involving chatbot that allegedly promoted suicidal ideation to youth. As a result, several of these bills, like New York’s S-3008C (enacted), introduce safety-focused provisions, including directing users to crisis resources. Additionally, […]

[…] Vice President for Privacy, Safety and Regulatory Affairs, and Corporate Vice President for Global Tech and Regulatory Policy.  In her leadership roles at Microsoft, Julie was a central figure in global internal and external regulatory affairs, covering a broad set of issues that are central to building trust in the AI era, including regulatory […]

[…] through user-generated input. For example, a 2015 claim against Snap, Inc. survived Section 230 dismissal following a claim that a specific “Speed Filter” Snapchat feature (since discontinued) promoted reckless driving.  In other cases, the personalization of a system through demographic-based targeting that causes harm may also implicate tort and product liability law when organizations […]