Search results

[…] White Paper discusses the judicial oversight and safeguards under the Section 702 PRISM and Upstream programs. Chapter 3 discusses numerous actions and reforms undertaken since 2013 to promote oversight, transparency, and democratic accountability for national security surveillance. D. Conclusion Under the Data Protection Directive, transfers of personal data can be made to third countries […]

[…] used’ for’ law’ enforcement’ purposes.’ ‘ The’ Attorney’ General’also’must’make’an’annual’report’to’Congress’and’the’public’about’the’total’number’of’applications’made’for’orders’and’extensions’of’orders,’as’well’as’the’total’number’that’were’granted,’modified,’or’denied.”’Chapter’2’of’this’White’Paper’discusses’the’judicial’oversight’and’safeguards’under’ the’ Section’ 702′ PRISM’ and’ Upstream’ programs.’ ‘ Chapter’ 3′ discusses’numerous’ actions’ and’ reforms’ undertaken’ since’ 2013′ to’ promote‘ oversight,’transparency,’and’democratic’accountability’for’national’security’surveillance.”D.#Conclusion#”Under’ the’ Data’ Protection’ Directive,’ transfers’ of’ personal’ data’ can’ be’ made’to’ third’ countries’ if’ there’ is’ “adequate”‘ protection,’ which’ the’ ECJ’ has’ stated’ means'”essentially’ equivalent”‘ […]

[…] the impact of the current privacy framework on Internet commerce and innovation. The Department also is soliciting input on the necessity of adjusting today’s privacy framework to promote innovation and privacy in the web-centric information environment. 3 The Internet plays an important role in America’s economic growth, and in the everyday lives of Americans. […]

[…] all designed to meet the unique and changing nee ds of research and education. AARNet works closely with the research and education sector, industry, and government to promote a safe and secure internet environment, fostering innovation while protecting the integrity of Australia’s digital infrastructure. Learn more at aarnet.edu.au. YOUTH PRIVACY IN AUSTRALIA: INSIGHTS FROM […]

[…] 2025), https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/FPF_CCPA-Regulations-Issue-Brief.pdf (discussing the latest CCPA rulemaking package 10 Another possible contributing factor as to why the “California model” never caught on was coordinated lobbying eorts that promoted the WPA framework. See Brendan Bordelon & Alfred Ng, Tech Lobbyists Are Running the Table on State Privacy Laws, POLITICO (Aug. 16, 2023), https://www.politico.com/ news/2023/08/16/tech-lobbyists-state-privacy-laws-00111363; Alfred […]

[…] networking among peers, fostering new connections and addressing common challenges. We anticipate lively group discussions and encourage active participation from each attendee. (Chatham House Rules & FPF’s Code of Conduct are to be followed please). Hotel Information Yours Truly DC Hotel is located at 1143 New Hampshire Ave NW, Washington, DC 20037. Located just steps […]

[…] all designed to meet the unique and changing nee ds of research and education. AARNet works closely with the research and education sector, industry, and government to promote a safe and secure internet environment, fostering innovation while protecting the integrity of Australia’s digital infrastructure. Learn more at arnet.edu.au YOUTH PRIVACY IN AUSTRALIA: INSIGHTS FROM […]

[…] case, the operator is deemed to have collected the information); and 2 (B) does not include any organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev enue Code of 1986 and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code . nonprofit entity that would otherwise be exempt from coverage under section 45 of […]

[…] and ownership of Banco Popular instruments. Those deemed eligible could then submit comments through an online form. More than 23,000 comments were received, each assigned an alphanumeric code. In June 2019, the SRB transferred 1,104 comments relevant to the valuation to Deloitte via a secure server. Deloitte never received the underlying identification data or […]

[…] Chart: Risk Assessment (DPIA) Requirements in California, Colorado, and the EU California Colorado EU FPF Analysis: CA v. CO References California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185, subd. (a)(15) Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1309 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 35 This comparison chart focuses on the […]