Search results

WORKING GROUPS FPF Working Groups bring industry leaders together with FPF staff and experts to develop best practices, share insights, and promote pragmatic public policy solutions. Working Group members receive regular written updates on privacy developments in their field. FPF members can access these working groups via the FPF Portal communities. For those without […]

[…] alignment between data protection regulators, with the G7 Data Protection Authorities and Privacy Commissioners’ Summit in Tokyo. This resulted in a communiqué outlining their focus on Data Free Flow with Trust (DFFT), emerging technologies, and enforcement cooperation. FPF’s Global team circled the globe, hosting and speaking at leading events this year, including the Global […]

[…] Benifei (Member of European Parliament, co-Rapporteur of the AI Act), John Edwards (Information Commissioner, U.K. Information Commissioner’s Office), and Louisa Specht-Riemenschneider (Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information, Germany), on Cross-regulatory Cooperation Between Digital Regulators.  Their panel began by painting a detailed portrait of how the proliferation of digital regulations has created […]

[…] lowest numerical applicability thresholds of any of the state comprehensive privacy laws when the law was enacted in 2023. At that time, prior comprehensive privacy laws in Virginia, Colorado, Utah, Connecticut, Iowa, and Indiana all applied to controllers that either (1) control or process the personal data of at least 100,000 consumers (“the general […]

[…] contract performance, bringing Indonesia closer to global privacy frameworks. In November 2023, the Philippines‘ National Privacy Commission issued a Circular on Consent, clarifying valid consent standards and promoting transparency. The guidance aims to reduce consent fatigue by encouraging layered, contextual consent interfaces and outlines when consent may not be strictly necessary. South Korea amended […]

[…] the advancement of science and healthcare improvements which are accomplished with de-identified data. Properly implemented de-identification complying with the HIPAA de-identification provisions goes a long way toward promoting such a reasonable balance, but I would suggest that there is still room for further improvements in this regard. Where Should We Go From Here? Perhaps […]

[…] high utility loss for QIs) Masking Obscure parts of data values (e.g., XXXX) Obscure direct identifiers Simple; Preserves format Limited privacy protection; Can reduce utility; Hard for free text Low (Insufficient for QIs in queries) Generalization Replace specific values with broader categories Reduce identifiability via QIs Basis for k-anonymity Significant utility loss, especially in […]

[…] with recognition “Breakfast brought to you by ” »Company name and logo displayed on signage at event »Recognition with company logo on invitations, event sites and on-site promotional materials »Official recognition of sponsor during Opening Remarks »Opportunity to provide (1) promotional item and (1) giveaway via QR code on breakfast tables. Must be approved […]

[…] Sponsorship include: » Company name, logo , and website link in event invitations »Official recognit ion during the Reception by FPF Leadership »Opportunity to pro vide (1) promotional item and (1) giveaway via QR code. Must be approved in advance by FPF Sponso rship Team »Prominent recog nition of name and logo on signage […]

[…] found that while many offer alternative legal bases for data processing, consent remains the most widely used, often due to its familiarity, despite known limitations. This resource provides an updated view of evolving consent requirements and alternative legal bases for data processing across key APAC jurisdictions: India, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea, and Malaysia.