Search results

[…] ing awareness about various legitimate online threats, including  spyware, phishing, laptop security, and identity theft. 136 The  agency also has many other data security education initiatives  underway. 137 Many companies and trade associations are also  taking steps to raise awareness among their users about how  they can better protect their privacy and security. 138 Other non‐ profit organizations—such as Privacy Rights Clearinghouse 139  and the ACLU of Northern California 140—offer instructional  websites and tips for how privacy‐sensitive consumers can take  steps to protect their personal information online.   While much of this mentoring will be conducted within  schools, digital citizenship ultimately begins at home with pa‐ rental guidance and mentoring. 141 The empowerment strategies                                                                                                                        are at risk, and respond effectively, including asking for help; (2) are responsible  and ethical: they do not harm others, and they respect the privacy and property of  others; (3) pay attention to the wellbeing of others: they make sure their friends  and others are safe, and they report concerns to  an appropriate adult or site; and,  (4)  promote online civility and respect).  135. Anne Collier, ‘Delete Day’: Students putting messages that matter online, N ET  FAMILY  NEWS , (May 6, 2011, 2:41 PM), http://www.netfamilynews.org/?p=30376.  136. O NGUARD ONLINE , http://www.onguardonline.gov (last visited Jan. 20, 2013).   137. See, e.g., Prepared Statement of the Federal Trade Commission on Data Security  Before the H. Comm. on Energy & Commerce, H. Subcomm. on Commerce, Mfg. &  Trade, 112th Cong. 5–7 (2011) (statement of Edith Ramirez, Comm’r, Fed. Trade  Comm’n), http://www.ftc.gov/os/testimony/110615datasecurityhouse.pdf (de‐ scribing the agency’s educational efforts to address data security concerns.).   138. Trustworthy Computing Initiative, M ICROSOFT , http://www.microsoft.com/  about/twc/en/us/default.aspx (last visited Jan. 30, 2013); Yahoo! Privacy Center,  Y AHOO !, http://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo (last visited Jan. 30, 2013); Pri‐ vacy Policy, G OOGLE , http://www.google.com/privacy (last visited Jan. 30, 2013).   139. Fact Sheets, P RIVACY  […]

[…] networking among peers, fostering new connections and addressing common challenges. We anticipate lively group discussions and encourage active participation from each attendee. (Chatham House Rules & FPF’s Code of Conduct are to be followed please). Hotel Information Yours Truly DC Hotel is located at 1143 New Hampshire Ave NW, Washington, DC 20037. Located just steps […]

[…] all designed to meet the unique and changing nee ds of research and education. AARNet works closely with the research and education sector, industry, and government to promote a safe and secure internet environment, fostering innovation while protecting the integrity of Australia’s digital infrastructure. Learn more at arnet.edu.au YOUTH PRIVACY IN AUSTRALIA: INSIGHTS FROM […]

[…] case, the operator is deemed to have collected the information); and 2 (B) does not include any organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev enue Code of 1986 and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code . nonprofit entity that would otherwise be exempt from coverage under section 45 of […]

[…] and ownership of Banco Popular instruments. Those deemed eligible could then submit comments through an online form. More than 23,000 comments were received, each assigned an alphanumeric code. In June 2019, the SRB transferred 1,104 comments relevant to the valuation to Deloitte via a secure server. Deloitte never received the underlying identification data or […]

[…] Chart: Risk Assessment (DPIA) Requirements in California, Colorado, and the EU California Colorado EU FPF Analysis: CA v. CO References California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185, subd. (a)(15) Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1309 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 35 This comparison chart focuses on the […]

[…] Beyond disclosure and safety, some bills experimented with accountability measures tied to privacy and advertising . Utah’s SB 452 (enacted), for example, prohibits mental health chatbots from promoting products during conversations unless clearly labeled as advertising. California’s AB 1064 (enrolled) initially highlighted concerns about how personal data from chatbot interactions w ith youth may […]

[…] through user-generated input. For example, a 2015 claim against Snap, Inc. survived Section 230 dismissal following a claim that a specific “Speed Filter” Snapchat feature (since discontinued) promoted reckless driving.  In other cases, the personalization of a system through demographic-based targeting that causes harm may also implicate tort and product liability law when organizations […]

[…] personality-like features, whether it is a specific voice mode, or a consistent persona, or even a range of “AI companions.” Even if companion-like personalities are not directly promoted as features, users can build them using system prompts and customized design; an early 2023 feature of OpenAI enabled users to create custom GPTs.  Figure 3 […]

Conversational AI technologies are hyper-personalizing. Across sectors, companies are focused on offering personalized experiences that are tailored to users’ preferences, behaviors, and virtual and physical environments. These range from general purpose LLMs, to the rapidly growing market for LLM-powered AI companions, educational aides, and corporate assistants. There are clear trends among this overall focus: towards […]