Search results

[…] statements Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA) 198 Texas Capture and Use of Biometric Identifier Act (CUBI) 199 Washington Biometric Privacy Protection Act (BPPA) 200 Education-focused biometric laws 201 Youth privacy Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) 202 Unfair and deceptive practicesFTC Act Section 5 203 Health data privacy lawsHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability Act […]

[…] that is relevant to policymakers in the U.S. Congress, at U.S. federal agencies, and international data protection authorities.  Washington, D.C. – U.S. Capitol Visitor’s Center, Room SVC- 201-00 About the Privacy Papers for Policymakers Award The selected papers highlight important work that analyzes current and emerging privacy issues and proposes achievable short-term solutions or […]

[…] written reports, and other work products. Learn more about our supporters at fpf.org . ANNUAL REPORT 2022 33 2022 FINANCIALS EXPENSES Program ServicesGeneral & Administrative Fundraising $9,097,833$2, 201,321$1,106,506 TOTAL: $12,405,660 REVENUE Membership & Contributions Grants & Special ProjectsRegistrations & Sponsorships $8,344,566 $3,756,747 $83,699 TOTAL: $12,185,012 1) The figures presented here in the form of […]

[…] include a clear notice highlighting that the app is for users over 13. Nonetheless, the Garante did not provide spe- cific guidance for valid age verification mechanisms. 201 Our research shows that European DPAs are generally not ready to apply data protection require- ments to PETs in enforcement cases, with one decision from the […]

[…] currently exercised, have not been able to counter continuing widespread disregard for the data protection laws in the Member States.” 16 https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2009/wp168_en.pdf, https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2010/wp173_en.pdf  17 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0011:FIN:EN:PDF 18 https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST%206607%202013%20REV% 201/EN/pdf. 19  See para. 5 at https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST%206607%202013%20REV%201/EN/pdf. 20 See p. 23 at https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-8004-2013-INIT/en/pdf 21 https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2014/wp218_en.pdf 22 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52016AG0006%2801%29. 23 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CONSIL:ST_5419_2016_ADD_1&from=EN. 24 See Amendment 99, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014AP0212&from=EN. 25 See p. […]

[…] Data Protection Regulation, several Member States have voiced their disagreement with the level of 23 See page 86 at https://eur – lex.europa.eu/legal – content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52012SC0072 . 24 https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST%206607%202013%20REV% 201/EN/pdf . 25 See para. 5 at https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST%206607%202013%20REV%201/EN/pdf . 16 | 30 prescriptiveness of a number of the proposed obligations in the draft Regulation. At the same […]

[…] 111 See Zhang supra , note 63. 112 Donald C. Clarke, “Methodologies for Research in Chinese Law” Vol. 30, University of British Columbia Law Review (1996), pp. 201 -209. 113 Donald C. Clarke, “Regulation and Its Discontents: Understanding Economic Law in China.” Vol. 28 Stanford Journal of International Law (1992). DRAFT 30 companies in […]