Search results

[…] (2) factors to determine when a secondary use is a “material new purpose.” These factors include the consumer’s reasonable expectations at the time of collection, the link between new purpose and the original purpose, potential impacts on the consumer, the consumer-controller relationship and the context of collection, and potential safeguards. These factors are inspired […]

[…] Article 1 of the LGPD identifies the objective of the law as ensuring the processing of personal data protects the fundamental rights of freedom, privacy, and the free development of personality.3 At the same time, Article 2 of the LGPD recognizes data protection is “grounded” on economic and technological development and innovation.  The study […]

[…] are experimenting with divergent frameworks in hopes of creating constitutionally sound models for youth online privacy and safety. See our comparison chart for a full side-by-side comparison between the Nebraska Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (LB 504) and Vermont Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (S.69). Download the Chart Two visions of scope Each AADC’s scope turns […]

[…] lowest numerical applicability thresholds of any of the state comprehensive privacy laws when the law was enacted in 2023. At that time, prior comprehensive privacy laws in Virginia, Colorado, Utah, Connecticut, Iowa, and Indiana all applied to controllers that either (1) control or process the personal data of at least 100,000 consumers (“the general […]

[…] contract performance, bringing Indonesia closer to global privacy frameworks. In November 2023, the Philippines‘ National Privacy Commission issued a Circular on Consent, clarifying valid consent standards and promoting transparency. The guidance aims to reduce consent fatigue by encouraging layered, contextual consent interfaces and outlines when consent may not be strictly necessary. South Korea amended […]

[…] high utility loss for QIs) Masking Obscure parts of data values (e.g., XXXX) Obscure direct identifiers Simple; Preserves format Limited privacy protection; Can reduce utility; Hard for free text Low (Insufficient for QIs in queries) Generalization Replace specific values with broader categories Reduce identifiability via QIs Basis for k-anonymity Significant utility loss, especially in […]

[…] EU AI Act: A Step-by-Step Guide, along with an accompanying Infographic. This updated Guide reflects the text of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AIA), adopted in 2024.   Conformity Assessments (CAs) play a significant role in the EU AIA’s accountability and compliance framework for high-risk AI systems. The updated Guide and Infographic provide a […]

[…] aimed at promoting the development and use of AI technologies. The intent of this comparison is to assist practitioners in understanding and analyzing key commonalities and differences between both laws. Finally, Part 6 of this article places the Act within South Korea’s broader AI innovation strategy and discusses the challenges of regulatory alignment between […]

[…] In March, Governor Cox signed several bills related to the governance of generative Artificial Intelligence systems into law. Among them, SB 332 and SB 226 amend Utah’s 2024 Artificial Intelligence Policy Act (AIPA) while HB 452 establishes new regulations for mental health chatbots. The Future of Privacy Forum has released a chart detailing key […]

[…] while scraping has long existed in a legal gray area, the rise of AI has heightened privacy concerns. He challenged the perception that publicly available data is free for unrestricted use, noting that privacy laws are evolving to address these issues. The discussion explored potential regulatory solutions, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between beneficial […]