Search results

[…] and cooperate with government policies. Business Operators (defined in the Act as individuals or organizations planning to develop, offer, or incorporate artificial intelligence technologies into their products, services, or business operations) are encouraged to actively utilize AI to improve efficiency and innovate, and to cooperate with government policies. Citizens are expected to deepen their […]

[…] of certain types of personal data. Under the amendments, a controller cannot disclose the following types of data in response to a consumer access request: social security number; government-issued identification number (including driver’s license number); financial account number; health insurance or medical identification number; account password, security question or answer; and biometric data. Instead, […]

[…] which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation for consideration. COPPA 2.0 would amend the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), initially passed in 1998 to provide protections for teens. On June 25, 2025, the Senate Commerce Committee held a mark-up hearing in which the Committee members favorably reported the bill […]

[…] up the crowd for “The Big Debates.” This event’s debate-style format allowed the audience to participate via real-time voting before, during, and after the debaters’ presentations.  Debate 1: “Current U.S. Law Provides Effective Regulation for AI”  Will Rinehart, Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, argued in favor of the statement, stating that existing […]

[…] BOARD MEETING June 11–13, 2025 • Washington, D.C. Sovereignty, Localization, and Related Challenges to Effective Cybersecurity Discussion Leads: John Verdi and Jocelyn Aqua SESSION DESCRIPTION An increasing number of regulations seek to restrict or limit organizations’ ability to process data in certain countries or outside of specific jurisdictions. These restrictions are creating significant challenges […]

[…] process to issue these rules, and engaged with numerous stakeholders and closely monitored market developments to promote consumer interests, innovation, and competition. Ms. Strickland’s testimony lists a number of valuable aspects to the rule, including its treatment of consumer controls, screen scraping, security obligations, and industry standards. Her testimony also highlights five areas of […]

[…] Given the rule’s breadth and depth, many stakeholders weighed in. In response to the proposed rule, over 11,000 comments were submitted. In ad dition to the sheer number of comments, the depth and content of the feedback is noteworthy as well. Many comments delved deeply into several corners of the rule, and were lengthy […]

[…] that is currently law in Maryland and several sectoral laws); and reasonable expectations (the approach taken by California). This rise of substantive data minimization rules raises a number of challenges and unresolved questions, which are explored in Part II. Some of these questions include the role of consent, what is a “requested” product or […]

[…] Legislation. Data minimization is a bedrock principle of privacy and data protection law, with origins in the Fair Information Practice Principles (FIPPs) and the Privacy Act of 1974. At a high level, data minimization prohibits a covered entity from collecting, using, or retaining more personal data than is necessary to accomplish an identified, lawful […]

1970-01-01 01/01/1970 January 1, 70