Search results

[…] about privacy, big data, technology, and civil liberties throughout the world, and also appears frequently in the media. At Washington University, he teaches courses on privacy, technology, free speech, and constitutional law, and is a past winner of the Washington University School of Law’s Professor of the Year award. He was born in England, […]

[…] use, and sharing of personal information about drivers, passengers, cyclists, and pedestrians. It is crucial that companies, advocates, academics, technical experts, and policymakers craft creative solutions that promote the benefits of connected vehicles while mitigating the privacy risks. Global legal frameworks have a role to play in assuring meaningful data protection and promoting trust, […]

Computers, Privacy and Data Protection (CPDP) Conference 2020 commences next week in Brussels, bringing together academics, data protection authorities, policymakers, data scientists, and civil society to network, exchange ideas, and talk over the latest trends. Check out the panels and events FPF will be participating in below.  Algorithmic Regulation of Transportation Wednesday, January 22 at […]

[…] browser extension, or global device setting, for consumers to express their intent to opt out.  For all of these individual rights, companies are required to take action free of charge, up to twice per year, within 45-90 days (except in cases where requests cannot be authenticated or are “manifestly unfounded or excessive”). Importantly, the […]

[…] States, a case it might end up rivaling in influence. The 2019 PPPM Honorable Mentions are: Can You Pay for Privacy? Consumer Expectations and the Behavior of Free and Paid Apps by Kenneth Bamberger, University of California, Berkeley – School of Law; Serge Egelman, University of California, Berkeley – Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer […]

[…] policy impact, making them “must-read” privacy scholarship for policymakers. Three papers were selected for Honorable Mention:  Can You Pay for Privacy? Consumer Expectations and the Behavior of Free and Paid Apps by Kenneth Bamberger, University of California, Berkeley – School of Law; Serge Egelman, University of California, Berkeley – Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer […]

[…] representation” of their data upon “verified request” and the names of third parties to whom it has been transferred (and, in Wicker, the names of service providers), free of charge (although Wicker limits free requests to 2/year). Deletion, Correction & Portability – Both bills would require companies, upon “verified request” to correct or delete […]

[…] he relies on behavioral advertising for the “lion’s share” of his revenue. Jho claimed that this settlement requirement will cause creators to suffer, and the quality of free children’s content on the internet to decline. Jho also articulated that there is confusion among creators about whether child-attractive or child-appropriate content will be considered “child-directed” […]

Introduction On September 13, 2019, the California State Legislature passed the final CCPA amendments of 2019. Governor Newsom is expected to sign the recently passed CCPA amendments into law in advance of his October 13, 2019 deadline. Yesterday, proponents of the original CCPA ballot initiative released the text of a new initiative (The California Privacy […]

[…] Privacy Forum CEO Jules Polonetsky regarding two European Court of Justice decisions announced today in its cases with Google: Key decisions about the balance of privacy and free expression still remain to be settled by the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Although the ECJ’s two decisions generally support the rights of those searching the […]