Search results

In May 2025, Nebraska and Vermont passed Age-Appropriate Design Code Acts (AADCs), continuing the bipartisan trend of states advancing protections for youth online. While these new bills arrived within the same week and share both a common name and general purpose, their scope, applicability, and substance take two very different approaches to a common goal: crafting a design […]

In May 2025, Nebraska and Vermont passed Age-Appropriate Design Code Acts (AADCs), continuing the bipartisan trend of states advancing protections for youth online. While these new bills arrived within the same week and share both a common name and general purpose, their scope, applicability, and substance take two very different approaches to a common […]

[…] Jordan Wrigley, Researcher for Health and Wellness, [email protected] K – 12 Education – Calls scheduled ad hoc ● P rivate sector participants discuss and learn about the latest student privacy issues. Daniel Hayes, Policy Fellow for Youth & Education Privacy, [email protected] Mobility & Location – Quarterly calls ● Manufacturers, technology suppliers, innovative mobility companies, […]

[…] with their own privacy laws. FPF actively tracked the state laws, which increased from five to twelve (or, arguably, thirteen). We also provided timely analysis of the latest developments out of Iowa, Indiana, Montana, Tennessee, Florida, Texas, Connecticut, Oregon, Utah, and Delaware — in addition to Washington and Nevada, both becoming the first to […]

[…] at our booth, visit FPF.org for all our reports, publications, and infographics. Follow us on X, LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube, and subscribe to our newsletter for the latest. event recap blog template (3) img 0823 (2) 1745437096396 img 0834 (1) img 0282 2 event recap blog template (4) img 1735 (1) edited (1) img […]

On May 7, 2025, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) hosted a “Deploying AI Systems” workshop at the Privacy + Security Academy’s Spring Academy, which took place at The George Washington University in Washington, DC. Workshop participants included students and privacy lawyers from firms, companies, data protection authorities, and regulatory agencies around the world. The […]

[…] lowest numerical applicability thresholds of any of the state comprehensive privacy laws when the law was enacted in 2023. At that time, prior comprehensive privacy laws in Virginia, Colorado, Utah, Connecticut, Iowa, and Indiana all applied to controllers that either (1) control or process the personal data of at least 100,000 consumers (“the general […]

[…] the advancement of science and healthcare improvements which are accomplished with de-identified data. Properly implemented de-identification complying with the HIPAA de-identification provisions goes a long way toward promoting such a reasonable balance, but I would suggest that there is still room for further improvements in this regard. Where Should We Go From Here? Perhaps […]

[…] values are replaced with broader, less precise categories. Examples include replacing an exact birth date with just the birth year or an age range, a specific ZIP code with a larger geographic area, or a specific occupation with a broader job category. This is a core technique used to achieve k-anonymity. While it reduces […]

[…] 2060. This rapidly aging population presents complex challenges and opportunities, particularly in the increased demand for resources necessary for senior care and the use of AgeTech to promote improved autonomy and independence. FPF will lead rigorous, independent research into these issues, with a particular focus on the privacy expectations of seniors and caregivers, cost […]