China’s Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services: A Comparison Between the Final and Draft Versions of the Text
Authors: Yirong Sun and Jingxian Zeng Edited by Josh Lee Kok Thong (FPF) and Sakshi Shivhare (FPF) The following is a guest post to the FPF blog by Yirong Sun, research fellow at the New York University School of Law Guarini Institute for Global Legal Studies at NYU School of Law: Global Law & Tech […]
FPF Risk Framework for Body-Related Data FINAL Digital
DECEMBER 2023 RISK FRAMEWORK FOR B O DY- R E L AT E D DATA I N IMMERSIVE TECHNOLOGIES The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a non-profit organization that serves as a catalyst for privacy leadership and scholarship, advancing principled data practices in support of emerging technologies. Learn more about FPF by visiting fpf.org. […]
14th Annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers
FPF is excited to announce the 14th Annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers winners and in-person award ceremony! The award recognizes leading privacy scholarship that is relevant to policymakers in the U.S. Congress, at U.S. federal agencies, and international data protection authorities. Washington, D.C. – U.S. Capitol Visitor’s Center, Room SVC- 201-00
OT-FPF-ca-report-infographic-digital_update2
EU AIA Conformity Assessment: A step-by-step guide Step 1 Am I obligated to perform a CA? Q1 Do I fall under the AIA? YES Q2 Is it a ‘high-risk’AI system? YES Q3 Am I the provider? YES NO Material scope: Art 2 Is it an ‘AI system’ as per Art 3(1)? See Table 1 Classification of High-risk AI systems under the AIA AI systems that are safety components of products or are themselves products that fall under Annex II AI Systems that belong to the use cases of Annex III + (EC) the output of the system is not purely accessory & is likely to lead to significant risks / (EP) significant risk of harm. NO Article 3(e) product manufacturer / distributor / importer / user / third-party responsible to perform the CA Step 2 When to perform a CA? EX ANTE Before placing the AI system on the EU market or putting it into service (definitions in Art 3(9,11)) EX POST IF Afer placing the AI system on the EU market or putting it into service: Substantial modification to the AI system• NEW AI system • NEW CA required IF reasons of public security or the protection of life and health of persons, environmental protection, and the protection of key industrial and infrastructural assets high-risk AI system placed on the market without a prior CA. (Art 47) Continued overleaf AI system that continues to learn + pre-determined changes documented in the initial CA no new CA required. 1200 Abernathy Rd NE, Building 600 | Atlanta, Georgia | United States | 30328 Atlanta | London | Bangalore | Melbourne | Denver| Seattle | San Francisco | New York | São Paulo | Munich | Paris | Hong Kong | Bangkok As society redefines risk and opportunity, OneTrust empowers tomorrow’s leaders to succeed through trust and impact with the Trust Intelligence Platform. The market-defining Trust Intelligence Platform from OneTrust connects privacy, GRC, ethics, and ESG teams, data, and processes, so all companies can collaborate seamlessly and put trust at the center of their […]
HHS_OCR_NPRM_RIN0945-AA20_Future_of_Privacy_Forum_Comments_June_2023
1 3 5 0 E ye S tr e et N W , S uit e 3 5 0, W ash in g to n, D C 2 0 005 | 2 0 2-7 6 8-8 9 50 | f p f.o rg J u ne 1 5 th , 2 0 23 V ia […]
Unveiling China’s Generative AI Regulation
Authors: Yirong Sun and Jingxian Zeng The following is a guest post to the FPF blog by Yirong Sun, research fellow at the New York University School of Law Guarini Institute for Global Legal Studies at NYU School of Law: Global Law & Tech and Jingxian Zeng, research fellow at the University of Hong Kong […]
FPF-AnnualReport2022-FINAL2-Digital
2022 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT 2022 1 CONTENTS About FPF ____________________________________2 Leadership Letter _______________________________ 4 U.S. Federal and State Legislation __________________ 5 Globa l ______________________________________ 10 FPF Issue Areas _______________________________ 19 Youth & Education Privacy _______________________ 22 FPF Membership and Special Events _______________ 26 FPF in the Media ______________________________ 29 Board of Directors _______________________________ 31 […]
What to Expect from the Review of Australia’s Privacy Act
The author thanks Anna Johnston and Alex Kotova (Salinger Privacy) for their review and comments and Gabriela Zanfir-Fortuna, Josh Lee Kok Thong, Lee Matheson, and Isabella Perera (FPF) for their support with editing this post. On February 16, 2023, Australia’s Attorney-General’s Department (AGD) released a final report (Review Report) on its multi-year review of Australia’s […]
FPF Article 25 GDPR A4 FINAL Digital
MAY 2023 Unlocking Data Protection By Design & By Default: Lessons from the Enforcement of Article 25 GDPR The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a non-profit organization that serves as a catalyst for privacy leadership and scholarship, advancing principled data practices in support of emerging technologies. Learn more about FPF by visiting fpf.org. FPF […]
FPF-PPPM-2023-Digest-DIGITAL-v3
PRIVACY PAPERS FOR POLICYMAKERS 2022 Privacy Papers for Policymakers 20221 February 16, 2023 We are pleased to introduce FPF’s 13th annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers. Each year we invite privacy scholars and authors to submit scholarship for consideration by a committee of reviewers and judges from the FPF Advisory Board. The selected papers are those […]